Thursday, June 20, 2013

Good news for Miami-Dade: Property values are increasing

Property values in Miami-Dade County rose for the second year in a row – welcome news for South Florida municipalities, which derive much of their revenue from property taxes.

“It’s a good thing for anybody in government,” Miami City Manager Johnny Martinez said.
The growth – about 3.1 percent countywide – was slightly less than Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez was expecting. Last month, Gimenez predicted property values would rise 3.5 percent, creating in an additional $33.3 million in new revenue for county coffers.
But on Friday, Gimenez said the revised figures were “something we can work with.”
“At least the decline in property values has stopped,” he said. “For some years, it was negative growth.”
Overall, Miami-Dade’s tax roll grew to $196.61 billion from $190.69 billion last year, according to initial estimates released Friday by Miami-Dade Property Appraiser Carlos Lopez-Cantera.
Real estate property values increased by 2.5 percent. Oceanfront and urban-core properties were most likely to see their values rise, along with residential condominiums.
Commercial property values, meanwhile, were generally flat.
Also providing a boost to tax rolls: Florida Power and Light’s improvements to Turkey Point Nuclear Plant. The power station saw its assessment jump by $1.4 billion, according to the property appraiser’s office.
Jack McCabe, a housing analyst in Deerfield Beach, said he saw property values rise across the board, partly because hedge funds were eager to invest in real estate.
“While the rate of appreciation is coming to a more historical norm, the forces driving it are entirely different,” McCabe said. “It’s not individual owner-occupiers buying homes to live in. It’s corporations buying homes to rent out to people.”
The final tax rolls won’t be certified until next month, meaning the figures announced Friday are subject to change. But the preliminary numbers will help taxing authorities begin preparing their budgets and setting their tax rates.
Since 2007, tumbling tax rolls had left South Florida municipalities and school districts scrambling to balance their budgets. Some made dramatic cuts to programs and services. Others negotiated employee concessions or forced layoffs.
But real estate values in Miami-Dade and Broward began to rebound last year, showing slight growth over the year before.
The growth this year was even stronger.
In Broward, the countywide tax roll increased 4.4 percent to $132 billion, Broward Property Appraiser Lori Parrish announced earlier this week. Every Broward municipality, with the exception of Lazy Lake, saw property values rise.
There were winners and losers in Miami-Dade.
Indian Creek, a small island community just west of Surfside and south of Bay Harbor Islands, saw the strongest increase. Property values spiked 19.5 percent, to $431 million from $360 million last year.
Other beachfront municipalities in northeast Miami-Dade fared well, including Sunny Isles Beach, Bal Harbour, Golden Beach and Surfside.
Florida City, however, slid 6.6 percent to $410 million from $439 million. In Opa-locka, property values fell 5.6 percent.
“The rebound is very neighborhood specific,” said Ron Shuffield, president of Esslinger-Wooten-Maxwell Realtors, one of the area’s largest brokerage firms. “But there are very few homes that are still decreasing in value because inventory is so low.”

 

     

 
 

  •  

     

     



    Good news for Miami-Dade: Property values are increasing - Miami-Dade - MiamiHerald.com

    RE/MAX: 5 Top Mistakes Home Sellers Make


    Miami Beach seller says Aqua condo board targeting his luxury unit - Business - MiamiHerald.com

    Miami Beach seller says Aqua condo board targeting his luxury unit - Business - MiamiHerald.com

    BofA, Wells Fargo fail mortgage servicing tests

    WASHINGTON – June 19, 2013 – Bank of America and Wells Fargo both failed tests checking to make sure the banks were following the rules of a national mortgage servicing settlement, a report released Wednesday shows.

    The $25 billion settlement between state attorneys general and five large U.S. banks announced last year was intended to clean up widespread evidence of shoddy mortgage servicing practices by imposing a slate of more than 300 rules. Wednesday’s report covered 29 tests gauging how they’ve done.

    Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase also failed certain tests. Only ResCap, formerly known as the servicing portfolio of Ally Financial, did not fail a test. The company has sold its loans to specialty servicers, who will continue to be evaluated on the rules.

    Bank of America was found to have failed two tests, each in the first quarter of this year. One requires banks to provide correct information in letters sent to homeowners before sending them into foreclosure. The other requires banks to tell borrowers working on a loan modification whether they have sent in all the correct documents within five days.

    Wells Fargo failed one test in the fourth quarter last year. It also involved telling people about missing documents within five days.

    The banks found in violation of the settlement have been directed to come up with plans to fix the problems. Should they break those rules again, the monitor can impose fines.

    The report, released by settlement monitor and former N.C. banking commissioner Joseph Smith, is the first disclosure of how the banks have conformed to the servicing standards. Previous reports have touched only on the amount of mortgage relief the banks have provided directly to homeowners.

    At last count, about $50.6 billion had been given through short sales, second-lien extinguishments and principal reduction. Not every form of relief receives dollar-for-dollar credit under the settlement. Some forms receive just pennies on the dollar.

    Wednesday’s report comes after tens of thousands of complaints have poured into the monitor’s office. Nearly a third have involved problems with the “single point of contact” system each bank is supposed to have in place to match a borrower in distress with a bank employee, the report shows.

    “The potential violations revealed by this process are consistent with what I have been hearing from consumers, state attorneys general, advocates, and housing counselors around the country,” Smith said in his report.

    For most rules, banks are allowed to make errors in a certain percentage of cases – for example, 5 percent. Failing a test means the percentage of mistakes exceeds that threshold.

    © 2013 The Charlotte Observer (Charlotte, N.C.) Distributed by MCT Information Services